Andersen’s tale of the naked king

My objection to this practice is linked to the moral.  I’m repulsed by the obviously fictitious and consequential inflation of a thing. Especially when it happens to be something. I love as is the case with photography.  And I am opposed to any attempt to distort the nature and function of a work. By publishing a poetry collection in a small. Number of copies or even by limiting the duration of an art. Exhibition to a single day which would increase interest dramatically.

All of the above I accept as a common practice

The fact that artistic value alone does not Real Estate Photo Editing guarantee success. And let it not surprise us that there are famous photographers. Of their inferior and younger. Colleagues simply because all the older ones famous and not did not and do not limit the numbers for sale. their photos. All of the above I accept as a common practice now but I personally prefer to declare my respect for photography and myself by not adopting this practice.

Real Estate Photo Editing

I would like to caress the ears of the delegates

There is no reason why a gallery should not mediate Aleart News a photographic sale as long as the way of selling and determining the price that is inherent in the nature of the photographic medium is sought. However the fictitious intervention that attempts to falsify its identity does not. I think serve its dissemination in the best way. I would like to caress the ears of the delegates with praise for the past and with hopes for the future. Unfortunately the only thing I can do is the second since the past brings only negative memories from my contact and more often from my lack of contact with.

See also  The fate of the Museum of Photography